AI And Security: Safeguarding Our Future

AI Security Concerns: Risks and Mitigation Strategies

AI, or Artificial Intelligence—the buzzword today—refers to imparting intelligence to machines. It has become an inevitable part of our daily lives, from planning trip itineraries to creating Ghibli-style images! However, with the rise of AI, serious privacy and security concerns have surfaced. In this article, I highlight the major AI security concerns and discuss possible mitigation strategies.


1. Traditional Cybersecurity VS. AI Security

While both traditional cybersecurity and AI security aim to protect digital systems, their focus areas, threat models, and approaches differ significantly.

  • Traditional Cybersecurity: Safeguards networks, servers, devices, and data from known threats like unauthorized access, malware, ransomware, and DDoS attacks. Defenses are largely signature-based or behavior-based.

  • AI Security: Goes beyond infrastructure protection. It focuses on securing the AI models themselves, their training data, and the decisions they produce. It must handle threats such as:

    • Data Poisoning: Manipulating training data to corrupt models.

    • Adversarial Inputs: Slightly altered inputs that trick models.

    • Model Extraction: Stealing models through APIs.

Traditional systems are attacked mainly at the network and software layers, but AI systems open up new surfaces: model weights, datasets, feature engineering, and even inference stages. Moreover, AI models are often black boxes, making manipulation and errors much harder to detect.


2. Emerging Threats in AI

The Rise of Generative AI Risks

Powerful models like GPT, DALL·E, and deepfake tools have driven incredible advances — but also new risks. Generative AI can produce hyper-realistic audio, video, and text that are difficult to distinguish from genuine content. For example:

  • Deepfake videos of political figures making false statements threaten election integrity.

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT or Gemini can hallucinate—producing plausible but false information. In 2023, a New York lawyer faced sanctions after citing non-existent cases generated by ChatGPT in court filings.

Such hallucinations are particularly dangerous in sensitive domains like healthcare or law, where accuracy is critical.

Biases and Ethical Concerns

AI models often inherit—and sometimes amplify—the biases present in their training data. For instance, certain algorithms intended to reform the American justice system were found to unfairly penalize Black individuals while being lenient toward White individuals.

This underscores urgent ethical concerns around:

  • Fairness: Avoiding bias

  • Inclusivity: Ensuring diverse representation

  • Accountability: Holding developers and users responsible


3. New Attack Vectors in AI

AI systems introduce unique and sophisticated attack surfaces:

  • Data Poisoning Attacks: Adversaries insert malicious data into training sets to corrupt the model subtly.
    Example: Poisoned images uploaded to open-source datasets can cause vision models to misclassify stop signs or human faces.

  • Model Inversion and Membership Inference Attacks:

    • Model Inversion: Attackers reconstruct training data by querying the model.

    • Membership Inference: Attackers infer whether a specific record was part of the training set.
      A study on healthcare machine learning models demonstrated how patient privacy could be compromised, posing serious risks under HIPAA and GDPR.

  • Adversarial Attacks: Inputs are carefully modified to trick models into wrong predictions—dangerous for autonomous vehicles, medical diagnostics, and security systems.


4. Global Regulatory Landscape for AI

Governments are waking up to the risks AI presents and are beginning to regulate its development and deployment:

  • European Union: Passed the world’s first comprehensive AI law—The EU AI Act (2024)—categorizing systems by risk levels and imposing strict controls on high-risk applications (e.g., biometric surveillance, recruitment tools).

  • United States: Issued executive orders and agency guidelines focusing on AI safety, non-discrimination, and transparency. However, the U.S. lacks a unified, comprehensive framework compared to the EU.

  • China: Regulations emphasize content moderation, censorship control, and mandatory real-name registration for AI-generated media.

Unlike traditional compliance requirements, ethics in AI isn’t just about meeting legal standards — it’s about taking full responsibility for the impacts AI can have.


5. Key Principles for Secure and Ethical AI

To secure AI and foster public trust, organizations must embrace core principles:

  • Fairness: Avoid bias and ensure inclusive model outcomes.

  • Transparency: Clearly explain how and why AI decisions are made.

  • Accountability: Hold developers, deployers, and users responsible for AI-driven results.


6. Building a Resilient AI Security Strategy

To protect against AI-specific threats, organizations and governments must:

  • Monitor training datasets: Detect and correct hidden biases.

  • Use cryptographic techniques: Implement data provenance and differential privacy.

  • Test models for robustness: Simulate adversarial attacks to uncover vulnerabilities.

  • Continuously monitor behavior: Detect anomalies that may indicate tampering or drift.

  • Blend innovation with security: Promote responsible AI development without stifling progress.

AI governance should be proactive, resilient, and evolve alongside the technology itself.


7. Conclusion: Securing the Future of AI

AI marks the beginning of a new technological era—and we must be prepared to secure it. If we fail to address AI security challenges today, we risk materializing humankind’s worst nightmare: being overpowered by machines we can no longer control.

By embedding security, fairness, and accountability into every stage of AI development, we can ensure that the AI revolution remains one of humankind’s greatest achievements — not its gravest threat.

Quantum-Safe Encryption: Safeguarding Data For The Quantum Era

In Today’s Ever-Evolving Cybersecurity Landscape, Staying Ahead Of Potential Threats Is A Constant Challenge. Advanced Persistent Threats, Ransomware, And Wipers Are Just A Few Risks Organizations Must Guard Against. However, Quantum Computing Is One Of The Most Complex And Far-Reaching Challenges On The Horizon. While Not An Immediate Threat, “Collect Now, De

Preparing for Quantum Computing: The Next Frontier in Cybersecurity

In today’s ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape, staying ahead of potential threats is a constant challenge. Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs), ransomware, and destructive wipers are just a few of the risks organizations must guard against. However, quantum computing represents one of the most complex and far-reaching challenges on the horizon.

While not an immediate threat, the concept of “collect now, decrypt later” underscores the urgency of preparing for a future where current cryptographic standards may be rendered obsolete.


The Promise and Peril of Quantum Computing

Quantum computers have the ability to perform complex calculations exponentially faster than classical computers. This capability promises to revolutionize many scientific fields, including chemistry, physics, and materials science.

However, in the wrong hands, quantum computing poses a significant risk by potentially breaking today’s encryption methods and exposing sensitive data to malicious actors.


The Threat to Traditional Encryption

Current encryption protocols such as RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC)—commonly used in HTTPS, SSH, and IPsec VPNs—rely on the difficulty of factoring large numbers or solving discrete logarithm problems for security.

Quantum computers, leveraging algorithms like Shor’s algorithm, could efficiently solve these problems, making traditional encryption vulnerable.

While a sufficiently powerful quantum computer capable of breaking modern encryption is unlikely to appear within the next 8–10 years, this timeline is shrinking with rapid technological advances. Meanwhile, adversaries are already collecting and storing sensitive data for future decryption, highlighting the need for proactive defense strategies against post-quantum threats.


Quantum-Safe Encryption Strategies

To counteract these risks, organizations must adopt quantum-safe encryption techniques that can withstand advancements in quantum computing. Three major approaches are under active development:

  • Quantum Key Distribution (QKD): Utilizes principles of quantum mechanics to securely distribute symmetric encryption keys even across untrusted networks.

  • Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC): Involves new cryptographic algorithms believed to be resistant to quantum attacks, such as lattice-based encryption.

Fortinet, for example, has introduced quantum-safe security solutions, integrating the NIST-approved PQC algorithm CRYSTALS-KYBER in FortiOS 7.6. Their approach also includes leveraging QKD technology through partnerships with vendors like ID Quantique to secure key exchange, supported by Fortinet’s FortiGate 4201F for network encryption and FortiTester for performance measurement.

The Race for Quantum-Safe Solutions

In response to the looming threat posed by quantum computing, the global cybersecurity community is actively developing quantum-safe encryption standards.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is leading the Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Project, rigorously evaluating and selecting quantum-resistant algorithms. This initiative is crucial for enabling widespread adoption of quantum-safe encryption.


Challenges Ahead

Transitioning from traditional encryption to quantum-safe solutions is complex and presents challenges including:

  • Interoperability: Ensuring new algorithms work across diverse systems and platforms.

  • Performance Impact: Managing potential increases in computational overhead.

  • Backward Compatibility: Supporting legacy systems during the migration phase.

Organizations must carefully assess their existing cryptographic infrastructure and develop clear roadmaps to migrate toward quantum-resistant encryption.


In conclusion, while quantum computing is not an immediate threat, its transformative potential demands early preparation. Embracing quantum-safe encryption today is vital to securing sensitive information tomorrow.

Securing Financial Institutions: Emerging Threats In Banking & Finance

Cybersecurity in the Financial Sector: Guarding the Digital Vault

Imagine walking into a grand, bustling bank — polished floors, busy staff, customers coming and going. Now, imagine an invisible thief silently slipping through the walls, targeting the bank’s most valuable treasures: personal information, financial records, and corporate secrets. This is not fiction. It’s happening every day — not in the physical world, but in the digital one.


The Digital Heart of the Global Economy

In today’s fast-moving world, banks and financial institutions are the backbone of the global economy. From mobile banking apps to AI-powered investment platforms, technology has made managing money faster and more convenient than ever before. But this wave of innovation has also brought a darker side: cyber threats that are smarter, faster, and more dangerous.

Hackers and cybercriminals now see financial institutions as gold mines. Whether a multinational bank or a startup offering online payments, no organization is truly safe. These attackers are highly trained, organized, and sometimes state-sponsored. Their goal? To quietly infiltrate systems, remain hidden, and inflict maximum damage — stealing data, freezing operations, or undermining the very trust customers place in their banks.

The threat is real and growing. As banks build bigger digital empires, their defenses must grow stronger too.


Case Study: The Bangladesh Bank Heist

One of the most infamous cybercrimes in the financial world occurred in 2016, when hackers infiltrated the Bangladesh Bank’s systems and attempted to steal nearly $1 billion via fraudulent transactions over the SWIFT network. Although most transactions were blocked, approximately $81 million was successfully transferred and laundered through casinos in the Philippines.

This incident exposed vulnerabilities in global banking infrastructure and served as a wake-up call for financial institutions worldwide.


The Evolving Cyber Threat Landscape

The financial sector has long been a prime target due to the sensitivity of its data and the high financial stakes involved. Recently, cyber threats have grown more advanced, with attackers employing sophisticated methods to bypass security.

Key Emerging Threats in Banking and Finance

  1. Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs):
    Long-term, stealthy cyberattacks aimed at gaining unauthorized network access and exfiltrating sensitive financial data over extended periods. For example, APT38, linked to North Korea, reportedly stole millions from global banks using such tactics.

  2. Ransomware Attacks:
    Malware that encrypts critical data and demands ransom (often in cryptocurrency) for decryption. Ransomware can disrupt banking operations and damage reputations. In 2021, a major bank experienced multi-day downtime due to ransomware encrypting customer data.

  3. Phishing and Social Engineering:
    Techniques that exploit human error by tricking employees into revealing credentials or clicking malicious links. One finance company’s employees fell victim to a fake IT support email, granting attackers full system access.

  4. Third-Party Vulnerabilities:
    Many banks depend on external vendors for cloud services and payment processing. Weak security in third-party systems can become an attack vector. A major payment processor breach once impacted several banks relying on its services.

  5. Insider Threats:
    Risks originating from within — either malicious insiders or negligent employees. For instance, an employee at a multinational bank leaked customer data in exchange for money, resulting in severe consequences.


Regulatory and Compliance Challenges

With cyber threats evolving rapidly, regulatory bodies worldwide have tightened compliance requirements. Financial institutions must navigate complex regulations governing data protection and cybersecurity standards to safeguard customer information and remain compliant.


The Importance of Proactive Security Measures

To effectively combat emerging threats, financial institutions must adopt proactive cybersecurity strategies:

  • Robust Cybersecurity Frameworks: Develop comprehensive protocols to detect, respond, and recover from threats promptly.

  • Regular Security Audits: Conduct frequent assessments to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.

  • Employee Training: Educate staff on cybersecurity best practices to reduce social engineering risks.

  • Advanced Technologies: Leverage AI and machine learning to detect anomalies and threats in real-time.


Conclusion

Digital transformation offers tremendous opportunities for the financial sector but also brings heightened risks. As cyber threats grow more sophisticated, banks and financial organizations must remain vigilant and proactive. Understanding the evolving threat landscape and deploying strong, adaptive security measures are essential to safeguarding operations and maintaining the trust of customers in an increasingly digital world.

Digital Trust: The Most Valuable Currency In Cybersecurity’s New Age

The New Architecture of Digital Trust: From Assumption to Assurance

As we navigate an increasingly digitized world, I often find myself reflecting on a concept that’s more fragile—and more vital—than ever before: trust. Not the kind built over handshakes or years of reputation, but the silent, instantaneous trust that flows through every digital interaction.

In cybersecurity, trust is the invisible architecture that keeps systems functional, people confident, and progress moving forward. But what happens when trust is no longer assumed, but manufactured, manipulated, or stolen?

Today, we explore the shifting nature of digital trust in a world riddled with deception—and how organizations can anchor themselves in authenticity, transparency, and security.


The Illusion of Safety

We log in, transact, and share—assuming the platforms we use are secure, the systems behind them verified, and the people on the other end genuine. But that assumption grows weaker by the day.

  • Advanced phishing schemes now mimic real executives.

  • Deepfakes deliver flawless impersonations.

  • Credentials are bundled and sold on the dark web.

  • AI-generated emails are indistinguishable from human ones.

Caught in the middle are employees, customers, and partners—unsure whom or what to trust.

This isn’t just about data breaches or system hacks anymore. It’s about trust breaches—harder to detect and even harder to repair.


When Trust Becomes a Target

In modern cybersecurity, perception is power.

When users stop trusting that a login page is legitimate, that their transaction is private, or that a company can safeguard their data, they disengage, switch platforms, or speak out. Suddenly, brand equity erodes—not because of a technical failure, but because of a credibility collapse.

Trust itself is now a prime target. Social engineering attacks exploit human trust rather than software flaws. Supply chain breaches abuse trusted relationships. Insider threats misuse reputation-based access. And misinformation campaigns slowly chip away at institutional reliability.

Deception has become the new weapon of choice—and it’s alarmingly effective.


Redefining Trust as a Security Layer

To fight deception, we must stop treating trust as a given—and start treating it as a strategic security layer.

This means validating everything: identities, behaviors, software, and data. It requires investing in systems that verify, authenticate, and adapt continuously—not just at the front gate, but at every interaction point.

Modern cybersecurity must evolve—not just to protect, but to prove. Prove that data is accurate, access is legitimate, communication is secure, and users are who they claim to be. In this new era, trust isn’t just earned—it’s engineered.


How Kavayah Cloud Secures the Foundations of Trust

At Kavayah Cloud Pvt Ltd, we believe cybersecurity is no longer just about stopping breaches—it’s about sustaining confidence.

Our platform is designed to enable provable trust across your digital ecosystem by helping organizations:

  • Identify vulnerabilities before exploitation with real-time risk intelligence and continuous monitoring.

  • Automate patching and incident response to reduce time-to-action when seconds matter.

  • Secure access and approvals so only verified identities engage with your systems.

  • Test and validate systems regularly to catch deception tactics that evade traditional defenses.

  • Enforce compliance, ensuring trust is regulatory, auditable, and resilient.

  • Vet third-party risk, because trust must extend beyond your perimeter to everyone you work with.

Through it all, we deliver clarity to leadership, control to teams, and confidence to customers—the trifecta defining digital trust today.


Embracing a Trust-First Future

As cybersecurity professionals, we are no longer just defenders of data—we are guardians of trust.

Every login, access request, and transaction poses the question: Can this be trusted?

The answer must come not from hope, but from hardened systems, smart design, and forward-thinking strategy.

The digital world isn’t slowing down—and neither are the threats. But with the right partner, tools, and mindset, trust doesn’t have to be fragile. It can be your strongest line of defense.

At Kavayah, we’re ready to help you build that foundation—not just for today’s internet, but for the internet of the future.

The Human Firewall: Why Cybersecurity Starts With People, Not Code

Humans: The Weakest — and Strongest — Link in Cybersecurity

In a world overflowing with threat detection tools, AI-powered defense systems, and complex firewalls, one simple truth remains: humans are still the weakest—and strongest—link in cybersecurity.

As someone fascinated by the evolving relationship between people and technology, I find this paradox both humbling and revealing. Despite remarkable advances in automation and intelligent systems, it only takes one careless click, one missed update, or one misplaced trust to compromise a billion-dollar security stack.

So, where do we really begin when we talk about cybersecurity?
We begin with us.


The Myth of the Perfect System

Organizations often look to technology as the ultimate defense—layering solutions, investing in tools, chasing certifications. But breaches rarely begin with a broken system. They begin with a compromised person.

  • An employee opens a phishing email.

  • A manager reuses passwords.

  • A contractor misconfigures a server.

These aren’t anomalies—they’re the norm. Nearly 90% of successful cyberattacks involve human error or manipulation.

It’s not because people are careless. It’s because attackers have learned how to exploit trust, fear, curiosity, and routine. In short, they’ve stopped hacking systems—and started hacking behavior.


Social Engineering: The New Frontline

Modern cyberattacks don’t always look like movie-style break-ins. They’re subtle, psychological, intentional.

  • A fake invoice from a trusted vendor.

  • A convincing LinkedIn message that mimics a colleague.

  • An urgent call from “IT” asking for credentials.

These aren’t software vulnerabilities—they’re human ones.

And unlike code, human behavior can’t be patched with an update. It must be understood, trained, and continuously reinforced.


Security Is a Culture, Not a Checklist

True security doesn’t live in firewalls or dashboards—it lives in daily habits, small decisions, and shared accountability.

A secure organization is one where:

  • Teams question unexpected requests.

  • Employees report suspicious activity without fear.

  • Passwords aren’t shared “just this once.”

  • Security training is ongoing—not once a year.

  • Leaders model best practices—not shortcuts.

Cybersecurity, then, is not a feature.
It’s a culture.
And that culture is built person by person, click by click.


How Kavayah Builds Strong Human Firewalls

At Kavayah Cloud Pvt Ltd, we understand that securing systems is only part of the equation. Securing people—empowering them—is just as critical.

Our cybersecurity and risk management platform includes a strong human-focused layer:

  • Learning, training, and compliance modules that equip your teams to recognize and respond to threats.

  • Access and approvals management to minimize insider risk and accidental exposure.

  • Incident and response playbooks that guide real people through high-stress situations with clarity and confidence.

  • Custom executive dashboards providing leadership with visibility into employee behavior and security hygiene without micromanaging.

It’s not just about preventing mistakes—it’s about creating a workforce that’s confident, alert, and actively part of the defense strategy.


Humans Make the Best Security System—When They’re Prepared

We often say the strongest firewalls are made of code. But maybe the strongest one is made of people.

A well-informed employee can spot a phishing attempt faster than any AI.
A trained team can contain a breach faster than any automated response.
A security-aware culture can prevent incidents from ever happening.

In a future filled with quantum threats, intelligent malware, and digital deception, the most resilient organizations won’t just invest in better tech.
They’ll invest in better habits.
Better awareness.
Better people.

At Kavayah, that’s the future we’re building—one human firewall at a time.


Would you like help formatting this for a specific channel, such as a whitepaper, presentation, or social

Quantum Computing VS. Cybersecurity: The Race To Protect The Future

Quantum Computing and Cybersecurity: The Race to Secure Our Digital Future

Introduction: The Quantum Leap

Quantum computing is the next technological leap—think upgrading from a steam engine to warp speed in computing power. It exploits the strange principles of quantum physics—superposition and entanglement—to solve problems that leave classical computers stumped. This promises breakthroughs like designing new drugs or optimizing logistics at unprecedented scales.

But it also poses a monumental risk: quantum computers could break the encryption that protects your private information on the internet. While quantum machines won’t replace classical PCs overnight, they threaten the very math puzzles (like factoring large primes) that keep emails, bank transactions, and medical records secure.

Cybersecurity depends on strong encryption, making the showdown between quantum computing and cryptography where the rubber meets the quantum road. The stakes? Both risk and defense are on the line.


Why It Matters: The Foundations of Today’s Internet Security

Today’s internet security relies heavily on public-key encryption methods such as RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), along with symmetric ciphers like AES, to protect everything from bank accounts to medical records.

If quantum computers can instantly solve the underlying math problems these systems depend on, they could decrypt sensitive data at will. Governments and tech giants warn: the time to prepare is now, not later.


The Quantum Threats to Encryption

1. Shor’s Algorithm — Cracking Public-Key Cryptography
Developed in 1994, Shor’s algorithm allows quantum computers to factor large numbers and compute discrete logarithms exponentially faster than classical methods. Since RSA and ECC security rely on the difficulty of these problems, a powerful quantum computer running Shor’s algorithm could break these encryptions in seconds.

Banks, e-commerce platforms, and even cryptocurrencies depend on RSA/ECC for key exchanges and digital signatures. A large-scale quantum computer would be like a master key, exposing encrypted communications, digital wallets, and more.

The risk is compounded by “harvest now, decrypt later” attacks, where adversaries collect encrypted data today, hoping to decrypt it once quantum machines are ready.


2. Grover’s Algorithm — Speeding Up Brute Force on Symmetric Encryption
Symmetric encryption algorithms like AES aren’t instantly broken by quantum computers, but Grover’s algorithm offers a quadratic speedup in brute forcing keys.

For example, AES-256’s security would be reduced to roughly the strength of AES-128, effectively halving its security level. This means defenders will need to use larger keys or enhanced algorithms to stay ahead.


Timeline Uncertainty: When Is Q-Day?

Experts disagree on when a quantum computer capable of breaking current encryption—“Q-Day”—will arrive. Earlier estimates placed it 30 years out, but recent analysis suggests it could happen much sooner—possibly within a decade, or even in secret already.

Because sensitive data often needs to remain confidential for decades, the threat window exists today, creating urgency to act immediately.


Real-World Stakes: What Could Go Wrong?

  • Banking: Attackers breaking RSA could forge SSL certificates to steal credentials or decrypt financial transactions.

  • Healthcare: Decrypted medical records could expose private patient histories.

  • Government and Infrastructure: Secure communications could be compromised, risking everything from intelligence leaks to sabotage of critical infrastructure like power grids or elections.

  • Cryptocurrencies: Wallet keys protected by ECC could be cracked, emptying accounts unless quantum-safe measures are adopted.

Quantum threats are not science fiction—they’re a looming reality that could jeopardize emails, dollars, health data, and even democratic processes.


Defenses: Post-Quantum Cryptography and Beyond

Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC):
The crypto community isn’t caught off guard. PQC focuses on classical algorithms based on math problems believed to be hard even for quantum computers. Examples include lattice-based schemes like CRYSTALS-Kyber and CRYSTALS-Dilithium, hash-based signatures like SPHINCS+, and others like Falcon.

NIST has standardized several of these quantum-resistant algorithms, and major tech players (Microsoft, Google, Amazon) are integrating PQC support into TLS and other protocols. Hybrid approaches using both classical and PQC algorithms ensure smooth transitions.

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD):
QKD uses the principles of quantum physics itself to detect eavesdropping on key exchanges. Though requiring special hardware and limited by distance and cost, it offers theoretically provable security and is being tested in ultra-sensitive environments globally.


Preparing for the Quantum Future

  • Inventory & Roadmaps: Organizations must identify where vulnerable cryptography is used and prioritize updates. Governments are already setting mandates to have quantum readiness plans by 2035.

  • Crypto Agility: Systems should be designed to easily swap cryptographic algorithms without major overhauls—a critical factor for timely upgrades.

  • Symmetric Key Updates: Use stronger keys like AES-256 and rotate keys regularly to mitigate Grover’s algorithm risks.

  • Standards & Cooperation: International standards bodies and governments are collaborating on PQC standards and research investments.

  • Public-Private Collaboration: Industry leaders and government agencies are running joint testing and migration initiatives.

  • Education & Training: Cybersecurity professionals must update their crypto knowledge and experiment with PQC libraries to be ready.


Conclusion: Urgency with Optimism

Quantum computing will reshape cybersecurity, but it’s not all doom and gloom. We’ve known about Shor’s algorithm since 1994, and proactive efforts in PQC have been underway for years.

Replacing all cryptographic locks worldwide is a huge task—like changing every lock on every door globally—but it’s achievable. The transition will be complex but manageable with strong collaboration, smart policies, and continuous innovation.

With a blend of humor and determination, cryptographers are already inventing the next generation of “quantum-proof” locks, ensuring that when Q-Day arrives, we’re ready—not panicked.

The cat-and-mouse game continues—but this time, the cat is quantum, and we’re sharpening our claws.